In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote:
Personally, I didn't think much of the early power fet designs. Too
current limited. But they were nice and simple to make.
I've got the Maplin ones (which claim 100w into 8 ohms from a circuit
very similar to the Myst) here in the workshop and they continue to
satisfy. Driving some home made speakers using Audax units. Obviously
some fluke of nature.
They should be fine if used within their limits. The problem with
commercial designs is that you have no idea what speakers people will use.
The power fets appeared in an era when the USA in particular was into low-
efficiency, low-impedance highly reactive speakers. They tended to have
both a limited current (Idss) and a channel resistance above an Ohm.
(Sometimes well above! I think I recall some that the makers only specced
as having a high-current channel resistance that was less than about 10
Ohms. Presumably because at the time what they made varied a lot from
device to device with the same part number.)
And in my case I wanted 200wpc for 8 Ohms and 400wpc for 4 Ohms along with
the ability to provide higher currents for peaks into 'nasty' loads. I did
experiment with some of the designs and devices suggested/provided by the
makers back then. OK for an 8 Ohm resistor. But many speakers were rather
different to an 8 Ohm resistor. My comments are about 30+ years ago,
though. Newer devices are, I guess, much better.
Slainte,
Jim
--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html