![]() |
Crossover op-amps
I've been playing with this active crossover
http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm and have used TL072 which I have lots of. But wondered what would be better - without paying a fortune? -- *Be more or less specific * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Crossover op-amps
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
I've been playing with this active crossover http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm No workee it seems ... and have used TL072 which I have lots of. But wondered what would be better - without paying a fortune? whatever 5532, OPA 275, BB 2134 come to mind, OPA 275 or 176, if applicable, are very well behaved turn-on and -off wise, nice if you have a power outage. Remember a 100 Ohm series resistor on the output. Do not run your power amps flat out, attenuating 15 dB makes a lot of sense and greatly reduces the risk of mishaps. 5532's surprised me in a listening test I was a part of but are perhaps "too forward". OPA275 are perhaps a wee bit laid back. My favourites are OPA176 or the also "up front" 2134. Most circuits I can imagine have two amplification stages, using different opamps may sound better than twice the same. Using a digital controller has interesting properties: steeper x-over possible, adjustable eq for troublesome midrange-units and DA conversion after x-over. Feel free to disagree, those who think there is no difference should buy the cheapest that sounds no different from the best to them. There are vastly costlier alternatives out there. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
Crossover op-amps
In article ,
Peter Larsen wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: I've been playing with this active crossover http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm No workee it seems ... Ah - it's not, is it? Was working earlier on today. and have used TL072 which I have lots of. But wondered what would be better - without paying a fortune? whatever 5532, OPA 275, BB 2134 come to mind, OPA 275 or 176, if applicable, are very well behaved turn-on and -off wise, nice if you have a power outage. Remember a 100 Ohm series resistor on the output. Right. For a direct replacement in the PCB they'd have to be 5533 or another dual op-amp. I've incorporated a mute relay before the power amps. 100 ohm resistor present Do not run your power amps flat out, attenuating 15 dB makes a lot of sense and greatly reduces the risk of mishaps. Right. 5532's surprised me in a listening test I was a part of but are perhaps "too forward". OPA275 are perhaps a wee bit laid back. My favourites are OPA176 or the also "up front" 2134. Right again. I'll get some prices. Most circuits I can imagine have two amplification stages, using different opamps may sound better than twice the same. Pity the site is down. There is an input stage, two stages each for high and low pass, four for mid, and an output driver for each. But non doing anything terribly taxing for any op-amp. The input has the choice of balanced - and I'd guess could be improved upon. Using a digital controller has interesting properties: steeper x-over possible, adjustable eq for troublesome midrange-units and DA conversion after x-over. I've enough problems with analogue. ;-) Feel free to disagree, those who think there is no difference should buy the cheapest that sounds no different from the best to them. There are vastly costlier alternatives out there. Kind regards Peter Larsen -- *If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest have to drown too? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Crossover op-amps
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
... I've been playing with this active crossover http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm and have used TL072 which I have lots of. But wondered what would be better - without paying a fortune? Take care with the circuit design particularly biasing resistors. The TL072 is a bi-fet op-amp and thus relatively high input impdenece which some designer may have tried to use. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
Crossover op-amps
On 6/11/2013 12:37 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
I've been playing with this active crossover http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm and have used TL072 which I have lots of. But wondered what would be better - without paying a fortune? **I'm rather partial to the AD825. Modestly priced and very high performance. You'll need to consider surface mount techniques though. Not available in DIP. Brown Dog have suitable adapters. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
Crossover op-amps
Re-read the OP. You're talking about active crossovers so
probably running at relatively high levels. IME you would be probably spending money unneccessarily - the TL072 is quite good at higher levels. I once built a set of line amps for my Quad33 using TL074s taking the tone controls out in the process. I ended up with amps that were frequency flat within +/-0.1dB from 14Hz to 240KHz and had a worst case phase error of about 15degrees at around 12Hz back to 0 degrees before 30Hz. They were noticably 'cleaner' than the original discrete amps. Later I built the pre-amp board with the same ICs and it too sounded good. I later replaced the TL074's with LM837sand could not tell any difference. The source was either CD or LP with AT90E(?) m/c cartridge feeding the Quad, thence a home built dual mono power Mosfet amp using amp boards from Ambit (remember them?) and a regulated supply designed by the great JLH, into a pair of transmission line speakers to the Dr Bailey design from WW 1972 (oh how I loved those speakers.) In an 18x12ft lounge I could rattle the windows with the pedal reeds from the organ of Limburg Cathedral - pity that disc went walkies. Them were't days................ -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
Crossover op-amps
On 05/11/2013 20:09, Woody wrote:
snip The source was either CD or LP with AT90E(?) m/c cartridge feeding the Quad, thence a home built dual mono power Mosfet amp using amp boards from Ambit (remember them?) and a regulated supply designed by the great JLH, into a pair of transmission line speakers to the Dr Bailey design from WW 1972 (oh how I loved those speakers.) In an 18x12ft lounge I could rattle the windows with the pedal reeds from the organ of Limburg Cathedral - pity that disc went walkies. Them were't days................ Do you happen to have the speaker design? -- Cheers, Rob |
Crossover op-amps
On 06/11/2013 08:37, RJH wrote:
On 05/11/2013 20:09, Woody wrote: snip The source was either CD or LP with AT90E(?) m/c cartridge feeding the Quad, thence a home built dual mono power Mosfet amp using amp boards from Ambit (remember them?) and a regulated supply designed by the great JLH, into a pair of transmission line speakers to the Dr Bailey design from WW 1972 (oh how I loved those speakers.) In an 18x12ft lounge I could rattle the windows with the pedal reeds from the organ of Limburg Cathedral - pity that disc went walkies. Them were't days................ Do you happen to have the speaker design? I've got the Bailey Wireless World articles and the CJ Rogers design, which is more elegant imho. The latter is also available somewhere on the internet... -- Eiron. |
Crossover op-amps
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote: I've been playing with this active crossover http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm and have used TL072 which I have lots of. But wondered what would be better - without paying a fortune? Personally, I'm usually happy enough to use something from the TL07x or 5532/4/etc families. Although I still would tend to turn to the more obscure HA12017 if I want good performance with a large voltage swing. Despite being made as RIAA amps then work nicely in other applications provided you take care with the compensation, etc. JIm -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Crossover op-amps
In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: http://sound.westhost.com/project09.htm is working today. -- *Ham and Eggs: Just a day's work for a chicken, but a lifetime commitment Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk