
January 22nd 14, 12:38 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
As most will know, speakers like the Spendor BC1 sound horrid if placed on
the floor. Raising them on a stand with air between the floor and the
speaker sorts out the bass end nicely.
In practice, the stand height places the tweeter roughly on line to the
ear when sitting down.
But is there a formula for the ideal distance from floor to speaker based
on cabinet volume or whatever? Or is it just 'enough' and more makes no
difference?
--
*Keep honking...I'm reloading.
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

January 22nd 14, 12:46 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message ...
As most will know, speakers like the Spendor BC1 sound
horrid if placed on
the floor. Raising them on a stand with air between the
floor and the
speaker sorts out the bass end nicely.
In practice, the stand height places the tweeter roughly
on line to the
ear when sitting down.
But is there a formula for the ideal distance from floor
to speaker based
on cabinet volume or whatever? Or is it just 'enough' and
more makes no
difference?
Speaker height was always regarded as that necessary to
place the speakers at ear level when in the listening
position.
Agree about the BC1 - but still a very warm speaker.
--
Woody
harrogate three at ntlworld dot com
|

January 22nd 14, 10:03 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
On 23/01/2014 12:38 AM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
As most will know, speakers like the Spendor BC1 sound horrid if placed on
the floor. Raising them on a stand with air between the floor and the
speaker sorts out the bass end nicely.
In practice, the stand height places the tweeter roughly on line to the
ear when sitting down.
But is there a formula for the ideal distance from floor to speaker based
on cabinet volume or whatever? Or is it just 'enough' and more makes no
difference?
**No. It is entirely dependent on the whim of the designer. Most (sane)
designers organise things such that the HF driver is close to normal ear
level. Some deigners place the bass driver close to the floor to obtain
'room gain'.
--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
|

January 23rd 14, 02:53 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
"Woody"
Speaker height was always regarded as that necessary to place the speakers
at ear level when in the listening position.
** One notable thing about the human head is that the eyes and
the ears are at the same level.
With most speakers, the tweeters are the predominant source for
sound location - so they set the width and height ( above the floor)
of the sound stage.
Most folk like the sound stage to be right in front of them when
seated in the middle of a stereo pair, as it helps them imagine
the performance. Same goes for TV and cinema screens too.
Eye level is the thing you set tweeters at.
..... Phil
|

January 23rd 14, 09:49 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
"Eiron"
Speakers can be quite directional at the mid/top crossover frequency if
the two drivers are too far apart, and they might be better tilted back
a bit. Not as bad as listening to ESL57s and moving your head 6" to one
side
but there might be a difference.
** Huh??
The treble, mid and bass panels on an ESL57 are concentric, vertical
strips.
Of course the virtual image shifts IF you shift - that is how stereo
works.
And of course if you have a party you need taller stands to put the
tweeters
at ear level when standing up.
** Really ?
There is simply no sound stage or virtual image to be had when folk are
milling about, boozing and chatting.
Makes Bose 901s the perfect party speakers.
..... Phil
|

January 23rd 14, 10:09 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
In article ,
Trevor Wilson wrote:
on cabinet volume or whatever? Or is it just 'enough' and more makes no
difference?
**No. It is entirely dependent on the whim of the designer. Most (sane)
designers organise things such that the HF driver is close to normal ear
level. Some deigners place the bass driver close to the floor to obtain
'room gain'.
With the BC1, the quality of the bass seems to change dramatically if it's
on the floor. More quality than gain? Hence the question in case there was
more to it.
--
*Why is the third hand on the watch called a second hand?
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

January 23rd 14, 10:11 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
In article ,
Eiron wrote:
Speakers can be quite directional at the mid/top crossover frequency if
the two drivers are too far apart, and they might be better tilted back
a bit. Not as bad as listening to ESL57s and moving your head 6" to one
side but there might be a difference.
So as a rule, midrange and tweeter need to be as close as possible?
--
*Santa Claus has the right idea. Visit people only once a year.
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

January 23rd 14, 10:54 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Speaker height above floor.
In article , Eiron
wrote:
On 22/01/2014 13:38, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
I'm puzzled why some manufacturers put the tweeter diagonally to the
same side of the midrange on both speakers of a pair. It blurs the
soundstage.
I guess it saves them the bother of having to make mirror pairs whilst
allowing them to tweak any effects due to cabinet edge scatter. Perhaps a
sign that they aren't that bothered about stereo image.
Jim
--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|