![]() |
Call the council noise complaints
I don't know if e any of you caught this series, but i listened to a couple
where the council left, presumably calibrated recording equipment with residents to try to find out if the noise they claimesd was ruining their lives was against the law. In both cases, it seems the actual recording did not show a very loud sound. To me this would point to perhaps structure borne sound or some kind of resonant point in a house that amplified the sound, yet no mention was made of this or attempt made to actually listen at the times it was supposed to be worst. I've always had my doubts about this sort of evidence. any comments? The most problematic one was a noisy extractor fan in the next flat, the other a kind of metal milling company who worked around the clock. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active |
Call the council noise complaints
"Brian Gaff" I don't know if e any of you caught this series, but i listened to a couple where the council left, presumably calibrated recording equipment with residents to try to find out if the noise they claimesd was ruining their lives was against the law. In both cases, it seems the actual recording did not show a very loud sound. ** That alone probably excludes a legal issue. To me this would point to perhaps structure borne sound or some kind of resonant point in a house that amplified the sound, ** Home owner's problem to fix. yet no mention was made of this or attempt made to actually listen at the times it was supposed to be worst. ** Not relevant if the SPL outdoors is not much above background. I've always had my doubts about this sort of evidence. ** Hardly scientific. .... Phil |
Call the council noise complaints
From the way it was affecting the individuals though, it was genuinely a
problem. I suspect that its more to do with the way our minds interpret it. IE we perceive it as being loud, but tits merely an irritating sound that you cannot get rid of so you stay awake. I don't think I'd put the ball in the complainants court though, the house is what it is, but it often seems that the person making the noises attitude does go a long way toward how it affects people. If they are sympathetic and can perhaps replace a an, then it might suffice, but aas in this case they were rather beligerant and dismissive, it can make tit all seem a lot worse. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Phil Allison" wrote in message ... "Brian Gaff" I don't know if e any of you caught this series, but i listened to a couple where the council left, presumably calibrated recording equipment with residents to try to find out if the noise they claimesd was ruining their lives was against the law. In both cases, it seems the actual recording did not show a very loud sound. ** That alone probably excludes a legal issue. To me this would point to perhaps structure borne sound or some kind of resonant point in a house that amplified the sound, ** Home owner's problem to fix. yet no mention was made of this or attempt made to actually listen at the times it was supposed to be worst. ** Not relevant if the SPL outdoors is not much above background. I've always had my doubts about this sort of evidence. ** Hardly scientific. ... Phil |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk