![]() |
Windows 7 query
So how is it that a machine with a fast multicore processor is delaying my
audio from input to monitor output, and an XP single core slower machine is not. Its really irritating as if you monitor yourself talking using phones the recording sounds like I'm drunk on the windows 7 machine. is there a way around this? Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active |
Windows 7 query
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:08:16 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: So how is it that a machine with a fast multicore processor is delaying my audio from input to monitor output, and an XP single core slower machine is not. Its really irritating as if you monitor yourself talking using phones the recording sounds like I'm drunk on the windows 7 machine. is there a way around this? Brian If you are using an ASIO audio driver you can specify the number of bits of latency assigned to the card. It's like buffering - the more bits the less chance of a stutter. Just about any machine these days should be able to deal with 10 milliseconds without trouble. That should not give the nasty effect you describe. d |
Windows 7 query
On 07/12/2014 00:08, Brian Gaff wrote:
So how is it that a machine with a fast multicore processor is delaying my audio from input to monitor output, and an XP single core slower machine is not. Its really irritating as if you monitor yourself talking using phones the recording sounds like I'm drunk on the windows 7 machine. is there a way around this? Brian Like Don said, it sounds like a latency problem. The Windows supplied Direct Sound drivers have high latency due to the layers of processing. ASIO (Audio Stream Input/Output) drivers use a more direct hardware access. If you don't have a proprietary ASIO driver for your audio device then do a search for the asio4all universal driver. It is free and the current version works well with most machines and all Windows versions. This should give you a latency of better than 10 ms. Tony |
Windows 7 query
Would this be in the klite codec pack perhaps?
The audio recording software tells me not to use the microsoft sound mapper so I've use the realtech one instead, but its still the same. I'm not up with driver replacements on 7 being used to xp of course. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Sumatriptan" wrote in message ... On 07/12/2014 00:08, Brian Gaff wrote: So how is it that a machine with a fast multicore processor is delaying my audio from input to monitor output, and an XP single core slower machine is not. Its really irritating as if you monitor yourself talking using phones the recording sounds like I'm drunk on the windows 7 machine. is there a way around this? Brian Like Don said, it sounds like a latency problem. The Windows supplied Direct Sound drivers have high latency due to the layers of processing. ASIO (Audio Stream Input/Output) drivers use a more direct hardware access. If you don't have a proprietary ASIO driver for your audio device then do a search for the asio4all universal driver. It is free and the current version works well with most machines and all Windows versions. This should give you a latency of better than 10 ms. Tony |
Windows 7 query
On 07/12/2014 12:57, Brian Gaff wrote:
Would this be in the klite codec pack perhaps? The audio recording software tells me not to use the microsoft sound mapper so I've use the realtech one instead, but its still the same. I'm not up with driver replacements on 7 being used to xp of course. Brian I just checked the klite web page, no mention of ASIO4ALL. If you want to give it a try then the ASIO4ALL developer website with download links is he http://www.asio4all.com/ It does come with it's own installer so no need to get involved with Win 7 driver changes. You probably will have to set your recording software or mapper to use the new driver after running the installer, though. Sorry I can't be more specific as I only have experience of installing ASIO4ALL under Win 7 with the Reaper DAW. This did not require system changes as the new driver simply appeared for selection in the Reaper ASIO driver list. The ASIO4ALL developer website does have a comprehensive FAQ list as well as a user forum. Tony |
Windows 7 query
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 14:09:29 +0000, Sumatriptan
wrote: On 07/12/2014 12:57, Brian Gaff wrote: Would this be in the klite codec pack perhaps? The audio recording software tells me not to use the microsoft sound mapper so I've use the realtech one instead, but its still the same. I'm not up with driver replacements on 7 being used to xp of course. Brian I just checked the klite web page, no mention of ASIO4ALL. If you want to give it a try then the ASIO4ALL developer website with download links is he http://www.asio4all.com/ It does come with it's own installer so no need to get involved with Win 7 driver changes. You probably will have to set your recording software or mapper to use the new driver after running the installer, though. Sorry I can't be more specific as I only have experience of installing ASIO4ALL under Win 7 with the Reaper DAW. This did not require system changes as the new driver simply appeared for selection in the Reaper ASIO driver list. The ASIO4ALL developer website does have a comprehensive FAQ list as well as a user forum. Tony I have a native ASIO driver for my sound card, but I also have ASO4ALL from a previous incarnation. As far as I can tell, they behave identically, and on my PC are quite happy at a latency of 2 milliseconds. d |
Windows 7 query
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:08:16 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: So how is it that a machine with a fast multicore processor is delaying my audio from input to monitor output, and an XP single core slower machine is not. Its really irritating as if you monitor yourself talking using phones the recording sounds like I'm drunk on the windows 7 machine. is there a way around this? Brian That seems to be more to do with the soundcard used where the older ISA and PCI cards monitored the analogue inputs via a digitally controlled mixer outputting onto the line out/speaker out purely as an analogue signal right the way through rather than doing an A2D - digital mix - D2A process. -- J B Good |
Windows 7 query
In other words, they improved it worse asper usual. I'll just get that
soundblaster card I put in the wardrobe and fit that then... Unfortunately, all the suggestions about a special driver look like non starters due to me needing system sounds and screenreader voice output but not on the recording. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Johny B Good" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:08:16 -0000, "Brian Gaff" wrote: So how is it that a machine with a fast multicore processor is delaying my audio from input to monitor output, and an XP single core slower machine is not. Its really irritating as if you monitor yourself talking using phones the recording sounds like I'm drunk on the windows 7 machine. is there a way around this? Brian That seems to be more to do with the soundcard used where the older ISA and PCI cards monitored the analogue inputs via a digitally controlled mixer outputting onto the line out/speaker out purely as an analogue signal right the way through rather than doing an A2D - digital mix - D2A process. -- J B Good |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk