![]() |
of music and reproduction.. was Please do not reply
Well, certainly the cheap vinyl turntables are as much rubbish as you say,
but you can still get good ones However, I beg to differ on digital. a good cd is still good, and making any kind of lossy copy of it is effectively making like a cassette version. The effects to my ears of mp3 are a fast cycling of phase information, and aloss of detail. Its amazing, though just what can be done to music and it still sounds acceptable, which is different to sounding right of course. There is room for all things, I just despair at the apparent popularity of mp3, when better lossless or minimal loss compression systems have existed for many years. As for the old systems, SP25/Amstrad/ Celestion rigs, these could sound very acceptable and good value at the prices. The problem often is finding the right room and speaker and listener placement to accentuate the good bits. I have here a pretty cheap goodmans system. Its problem is crap speakers and tape deck, but if you connect it up to decent speakers it actually sounds pretty good. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Eiron" wrote in message ... On 18/05/2015 00:22, RJH wrote: On 17/05/2015 16:43, Jim Lesurf wrote: In article , Sumatriptan wrote: But I agree that, apart from Jim, there isn't much activity here. Sadly, probably true. I assume many have gone to 'forums'. I could do the same but. Possibly, but as mentioned down-thread, I don't think 'hifi' has the hobbyist interest it once had. And even then, IME it was a minority sport. Most of my peers just wanted 'playback', with very little interest in how the music came about, or was reproduced. However, the means of listening to music did often require a degree of engagement - whether it was cleaning tape heads, aerials, cables/earthing or aligning cartridges for example. But the commodification of music and the digital age seems to have turned discussions to a kind of binary - it either works or it doesn't Loosely relevant, I have some faith in the resurgence of vinyl and the analogue intrigue. I went to a benefit gig this evening (ostensibly LGBT) when a chunk was set aside to this woman: http://www.theguardian.com/music/201...tchie-obituary Cutting a bagpipe LP backwards. As if anyone would notice! It might improve Philip Glass too. My copy of 'No Pussyfooting' has a second CD with one track reversed and one at half-speed. Legend has it that John Peel played it backwards on the radio. I wonder how he did it. Did they have tape decks that could run in reverse? Or two-track stereo decks? Hifi always was a minority interest. For every SME/V15/Quad/Tannoy setup there were hundreds of SP25/Amstrads and thousands of portables. But I'd wager that my hifi from the seventies would sound a lot better than a typical modern vinyl revival setup (if I still had it.) -- Eiron. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk