![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
More audio tomfoolery
In article , John R Leddy
wrote: John R Leddy;94210 Wrote: There are no Adobe products on our computers so I'm currently unable to use iPlayer. 'Jim Lesurf[_2_ Wrote: ;94214']get_iplayer doesn't require flash. It can capture live or 'on demand'. And IIUC ffmpeg can now play the live streams without it. Thanks Jim, that's me up and running with get_iplayer. There's been no need to look at FFmpeg so far. OK. BTW I'm assuming you *do* have ffmpeg (or avconv) installed. That's useful because get_iplayer will then automagically call them to turn fetched flv format files into mp4 or m4a. [1] Note that as the BBC develop the 'Audio Factory' that now drives iplayer serving the access processes will evolve. So we may find that this means current versions of get_iplayer may not work at some future point. The developers are working to keep up. But have to do so without any direct help from the BBC for whom get_iplayer is "not supported or condoned". So the first the developers of get_iplayer know about changes is when they happen. Apart from that they have to guess what might be coming next. Makes life 'interesting'... ;- Jim [1] For years now I've taken it for granted that anyone working on av files will find ffmpeg/avconv essential as a tool. Ditto for sox when working with audio files. Being able to use these makes life a lot easier if you need to process the files. -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Quote:
foobar2000 shows a URL of http://stream.psychomed.gr and a file path of http://50.7.173.162:8014/ for Audiophile Stream Network's http://yp.shoutcast.com/sbin/tunein-....pls?id=160671 SHOUTcast directory link, so I'm there already and streaming fine. I'm just plodding along with jazz at the moment, adding an artist to my music collection as and when I come across someone I like. Time has me struggling to maintain my music collection, so adding various subgenres of jazz keeps me busy whilst just about allowing me the time to keep tagging my other files. |
More audio tomfoolery
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:45:46 -0700, Phil Allison wrote:
Johnny B Good wrote: ====snip==== The remaining issue with DACs was the analogue output stage clipping that afflicted some of the earlier products due to inadequate voltage rail provisioning derived from the "Join the dots" peak amplitude calculations by some rather naive designers who didn't fully understand the process of handling a bandwidth limited analogue signal encoded into the digital domain. ** Not real sure what you are on about here, but the maximum signal level possible from a CD player is 2Vrms or 2.83V peak. Given that most players have dual 12 or 15 volt supplies for the op-amps, there is no such issue. The "Join the dots" approach to deciding the clipping headroom required in the DAC stages of *some* models of CD players would normally have sufficed with most music material. The trouble only really became evident as a result of the "Loudness Wars" techniques where the digital processing permitted 'soft limiting' to be taken to such an extreme as to be just shy of 'clipping'. It was the resulting steep leading transients on 'soft limited' waveforms that caught out the marginally sufficient of clipping headroom based DAC/ output buffer amp designs. In fact this deficiency in some models of CD player only became evident as a result of the research into the undesired effects of such dynamic range compression being taken to extremes by the perpetrators of the "Loudness War". Unfortunately, I don't seem to have the article(s) in question bookmarked to offer as a citation and googling "Loudness War" results in more than enough hits to choke a Blue Whale to death on if each hit represented just a single minnow's worth of protein. -- Johnny B Good |
More audio tomfoolery
In article: Johnny B Good says... Unfortunately, I don't seem to have the article(s) in question Possibly not what you were thinking of, but an interesting article about digital headroom. http://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/news...dio-goes-to-11 -- Ken O'Meara List of UK hi-fi & audio dealers: http://unsteadyken.esy.es/ |
Quote:
AtomicParsley FFmpeg [ffmpeg-2.2.3-win32-static] LAME lib MPlayer perl-licence RTMPDump [rtmpdump-20140302-git-79459a2-win32] VLC [vlc-2.1.5] Quote:
I'm trying to think of the things I've used Audacity for... Deleting huge artistic silences between the visible and hidden last track of an album; and also cutting those types of tracks in two. Reducing 24-bit 192kHz FLAC files to 24-bit 96kHz. I've used the Amplify effect on speech files (old radio comedy), but bottled-out using it on music my files. Your thoughts concerning this would be most welcome. Now I've opened this can of worms, here's a real-world issue which will probably never occur again. I have a John Mayall "Blues Breakers With Eric Clapton" CD [EAN 0042284482721] http://www.discogs.com/John-Mayall-W...release/448024 This CD contains both mono and stereo tracks which EAC has extracted to all being stereo. I have separated the tracks into two directories: John Mayall - 1966 - Blues Breakers With Eric Clapton (Mono), and John Mayall - 1969 - Blues Breakers With Eric Clapton (Stereo) I know you're aware I won't be held back by the minutiae, so whether all the tracks ultimately end up in one directory or two, those faux stereo tracks will be getting processed at some point. Before I drop them into Audacity [Tracks - Stereo Track to Mono], I would appreciate your best practice advice on what to do next. |
More audio tomfoolery
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:45:47 +0100, UnsteadyKen wrote:
In article: Johnny B Good says... Unfortunately, I don't seem to have the article(s) in question Possibly not what you were thinking of, but an interesting article about digital headroom. http://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/news...dio-goes-to-11 Thanks, Ken. That's definitely related to the point raised in the loudness war article about clipping being induced in some CD players by such processing and is entirely relevant. I've bookmarked that article. -- Johnny B Good |
More audio tomfoolery
In article , Johnny B Good
wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:45:47 +0100, UnsteadyKen wrote: In article: Johnny B Good says... Unfortunately, I don't seem to have the article(s) in question Possibly not what you were thinking of, but an interesting article about digital headroom. http://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/news...dio-goes-to-11 Thanks, Ken. That's definitely related to the point raised in the loudness war article about clipping being induced in some CD players by such processing and is entirely relevant. I've bookmarked that article. You may also find these of interest http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/Clipp.../clipping.html http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/OverTheTop/OTT.html http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/OTTre...d/results.html There are some AES papers on this as well, but alas as yet their e-archive isn't public. It should be sometime, and I can then start giving URLs for various articles on topics. Roll on open source... Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
More audio tomfoolery
In article , Johnny B Good
wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:45:46 -0700, Phil Allison wrote: Johnny B Good wrote: ====snip==== The remaining issue with DACs was the analogue output stage clipping that afflicted some of the earlier products due to inadequate voltage rail provisioning derived from the "Join the dots" peak amplitude calculations by some rather naive designers who didn't fully understand the process of handling a bandwidth limited analogue signal encoded into the digital domain. ** Not real sure what you are on about here, but the maximum signal level possible from a CD player is 2Vrms or 2.83V peak. Given that most players have dual 12 or 15 volt supplies for the op-amps, there is no such issue. The "Join the dots" approach to deciding the clipping headroom required in the DAC stages of *some* models of CD players would normally have sufficed with most music material. Not clear what you mean here. Do you mean "join the dots" to be linear interpolation (a la Legato Link) or oversampling by more accurate means? If so, what? Plain linear interpolation totally avoids having intersample *values* that clip, but does so by distorting the data-defined waveform. The trouble only really became evident as a result of the "Loudness Wars" techniques where the digital processing permitted 'soft limiting' to be taken to such an extreme as to be just shy of 'clipping'. That has certainly been a dominating factor. But it is more complex than that. Its quite possible to have a series of samples which fully and correctly defines an unclipped waveform *but* which - when correctly reconstructed - has peaks *above* 0dBFS. And then some DACs duly clip or distort as a consequence. In theory, the data and waveform are fine. But in practice the DAC builder didn't allow for this. For more detail see the URLs I gave in my previous posting in this thread. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk