![]() |
Image
Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of
imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? -- Cheers, Rob |
Image
On 25/01/17 08:28, RJH wrote:
Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? What's gonna happen with that request is that peeps dump their lists full of vocals recorded dead centre accompanied by the main instruments, with the sides shifted far left and right. Some rather dynamic suggestions ... Tiger, Paula Cole from 'This Fire' Secret Smile, Dan Wilson from 'Live at the Pantages' When I Need You, Jocelyn B. Smith from 'Live in Berlin' Mercy Street, Miriam Stockley from 'Miriam' Shine, Vienna Teng from 'Warm Strangers' Wish You Were Here, Pink Floyd from 'Wish You Were Here' Don't Give Up, Herbie Hancock from 'The Imagine Project' -- Adrian C |
Image
On 25/01/2017 12:32, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
On 25/01/17 08:28, RJH wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? What's gonna happen with that request is that peeps dump their lists full of vocals recorded dead centre accompanied by the main instruments, with the sides shifted far left and right. Some rather dynamic suggestions ... Tiger, Paula Cole from 'This Fire' Secret Smile, Dan Wilson from 'Live at the Pantages' When I Need You, Jocelyn B. Smith from 'Live in Berlin' Mercy Street, Miriam Stockley from 'Miriam' Shine, Vienna Teng from 'Warm Strangers' Wish You Were Here, Pink Floyd from 'Wish You Were Here' Don't Give Up, Herbie Hancock from 'The Imagine Project' I seem to remember a version of the Stones, Paint it Black that was recorded with exaggerated stereo, possibly intended as a demo of "binaural' listening. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Image
On 25/01/2017 12:32, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
On 25/01/17 08:28, RJH wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? What's gonna happen with that request is that peeps dump their lists full of vocals recorded dead centre accompanied by the main instruments, with the sides shifted far left and right. Some rather dynamic suggestions ... Wish You Were Here, Pink Floyd from 'Wish You Were Here' Wherever you think the instruments were in the studio, you are wrong. Of course, you might be able to hear where the engineer decided to place them. ISTR that the Cowboy Junkies Trinity Sessions is pretty good, though I haven't listened to it since I got the ESLs. And I would have to listen to my Thomas Tallis collection to choose the best. -- Eiron. |
Image
In article , RJH
wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? Try some of the chamber works provided with some issues of 'BBC Music Magazine'. They vary, but some are pretty good. The best are essentially an LPCM link from Radio 3 with minimal furtling along the way. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Image
On 25/01/2017 18:40, Brian Gaff wrote:
I was going to say, this is almost impossible also due to room effects and the like. I was quite impressed by some of the older Telarc classical titles that appeared shortly after cds came in. still sound very deep and yet precise today, so somebody obviously knew what they were about. That Telarc 1812 was severely clipped. Too much gunpowder! -- Eiron. |
Image
Graeme Wall wrote:
I seem to remember a version of the Stones, Paint it Black that was recorded with exaggerated stereo, possibly intended as a demo of "binaural' listening. ** This one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zga1NvZS4_I Try listening on headphones. ..... Phil |
Image
On 26/01/2017 05:33, Phil Allison wrote:
Graeme Wall wrote: I seem to remember a version of the Stones, Paint it Black that was recorded with exaggerated stereo, possibly intended as a demo of "binaural' listening. ** This one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zga1NvZS4_I Try listening on headphones. That's the bunny, thanks. Haven't heard it for decades. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Image
"Eiron" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2017 18:40, Brian Gaff wrote: I was going to say, this is almost impossible also due to room effects and the like. I was quite impressed by some of the older Telarc classical titles that appeared shortly after cds came in. still sound very deep and yet precise today, so somebody obviously knew what they were about. That Telarc 1812 was severely clipped. Too much gunpowder! -- Clipped they might have been but they were hellish big bangs - especially on the LP version played through a pair of transmission lines! -- Woody harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com |
Image
Graeme Wall wrote:
Phil Allison wrote: I seem to remember a version of the Stones, Paint it Black that was recorded with exaggerated stereo, possibly intended as a demo of "binaural' listening. ** This one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zga1NvZS4_I Try listening on headphones. That's the bunny, thanks. Haven't heard it for decades. ** There is a fair bit of old Stones material still on Utube but very little Beatles or Jimi Hendrix. Even amateur guitarists playing along with early hits audible in the background have been deleted over the last year or so. Copyright holders must have put their foots down. *******s. ..... Phil |
Image
On 25/01/2017 12:32, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
On 25/01/17 08:28, RJH wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? What's gonna happen with that request is that peeps dump their lists full of vocals recorded dead centre accompanied by the main instruments, with the sides shifted far left and right. Some rather dynamic suggestions ... Tiger, Paula Cole from 'This Fire' Secret Smile, Dan Wilson from 'Live at the Pantages' When I Need You, Jocelyn B. Smith from 'Live in Berlin' Mercy Street, Miriam Stockley from 'Miriam' Shine, Vienna Teng from 'Warm Strangers' Wish You Were Here, Pink Floyd from 'Wish You Were Here' Don't Give Up, Herbie Hancock from 'The Imagine Project' Many thanks - bit to go on there! I've only got the Pink Floyd track, but I'll have a look out for the others, and have a renewed listen. While I can usually pick out instruments/voices, I think the idea (discussed in the R105 thread) is that it's a pin sharp sense of 'sound in space' sort of sensation? I do get that - just not something I look out for, really. -- Cheers, Rob |
Image
On 25/01/2017 14:52, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , RJH wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? Try some of the chamber works provided with some issues of 'BBC Music Magazine'. They vary, but some are pretty good. The best are essentially an LPCM link from Radio 3 with minimal furtling along the way. Thanks - I'll have a look/listen. -- Cheers, Rob |
Image
In article ,
RJH wrote: On 25/01/2017 14:52, Jim Lesurf wrote: In article , RJH wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? Try some of the chamber works provided with some issues of 'BBC Music Magazine'. They vary, but some are pretty good. The best are essentially an LPCM link from Radio 3 with minimal furtling along the way. Thanks - I'll have a look/listen. Like for like, it is easier to position instruments from a decent recording the fewer there are. So a well recorded string quartet is a good starting point. When someone says they can position every single instrument in an orchestra, take it with a pinch of salt. -- *Bigamy is having one wife too many - monogamy is the same Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Image
Once upon a time on usenet Eiron wrote:
On 25/01/2017 12:32, Adrian Caspersz wrote: On 25/01/17 08:28, RJH wrote: Does anyone have a favourite recording, or good demonstration, of imaging? The sort of thing where you pick out an individual instrument and get an accurate sense of where the musician is relative to anything else that's going on? What's gonna happen with that request is that peeps dump their lists full of vocals recorded dead centre accompanied by the main instruments, with the sides shifted far left and right. Some rather dynamic suggestions ... Wish You Were Here, Pink Floyd from 'Wish You Were Here' Wherever you think the instruments were in the studio, you are wrong. Of course, you might be able to hear where the engineer decided to place them. I didn't see the OP ask specifically for accurate *actual* imaging. I listen to a lot of studio recordings with excellent imaging that was created by an engineer and enjoy them. ISTR that the Cowboy Junkies Trinity Sessions is pretty good, though I haven't listened to it since I got the ESLs. It's one of my favourite recordings and sounds great on my non-ESL speakers (no wank here, just appreciation of music). And I would have to listen to my Thomas Tallis collection to choose the best. Is that comment for anyone's benefit other than your own? Did you follow up? Findings? -- Shaun. "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification in the DSM*." David Melville (in r.a.s.f1) (*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk