![]() |
Digital Recorder
Yes go back and use a computer. It works better has better editing and snap
crackle pop removal in editing software. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "RJH" wrote in message ... I'd like to digitise a couple of LPs, and have the facility to do a few more as and when. I'm looking to get a standalone unit as lashing up the computer is inconvenient, plus I like the idea of having the tracks on the device or portable media like an SD card. Any recommendations please? I was thinking of maybe up to £200 new or secondhand. This looks to be OK, but does more than I need: http://www.solidstatesound.co.uk/tascam_sd-20m.htm -- Cheers, Rob |
Digital Recorder
In article , RJH
wrote: On 02/06/2017 18:59, Iain Churches wrote: "RJH" wrote in message ... Tascam is a very good choice. I'd also recommend Tascam from having an HD P2 recorder and finding it works very well. However that would perhaps be overkill. Has excellent meters, etc. An alternative is something like the Scarlett 2i2 with a laptop and suitable software. Audacity would do, although I use my own DIY software that has better PPM indication, etc. Thanks - they look to be good. I've also seen 'scratch recorders' that seem to fit the bill - Roland AR3000R and Marantz PMD 560. The obvious difference is that they're 16 bit (as opposed to 24). Without wishing to get into too much of a debate, might that matter? In practice the main advantage is that - given the ADC has a decently low noise level - you can easily set the recoring gain low enough to avoid clipping without under-recording the levels. Then if you wish, scale up a little when processing the results. The problem here is that - paticularly if you've not done kind of thing this a few times before - 16 bit may not give enough 'room' to avoid both clipping and under-recording unless you carefully start with the right level. However for LP if you're prepared to have a 'dummy run' you can get decent results from 16 bit if you give recording a run though and use that mainly to set the 'optimum' recording gain that just misses clipping peaks. Then have another go. Note, though, this means you need to ensure your metering will show you short peaks OK... and assumes you're using a decent ADC! Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Digital Recorder
In article ,
UnsteadyKen wrote: On the Sony MD recorders I've used, ejecting the disc and pressing record puts the machine into what Sony refers to as "Monitor mode"; The analogue input is digitised and a straight copy of this stream (which has not undergone any data reduction processing) is available from the digital outputs and a decoded version of this is available at the analogue outputs. Plus, of course the MD recorder will decode signals input via the Digital connections and output them via analogue. £30 or thereabouts will buy one with a faulty disc mechanism and or lost remote ETC on eBay. Not bad for a pretty fair combined ADC and DAC. Yup - I used one for some time to convert the toslink feed from my TV to analogue for the external sound system. Mainly because the usual toslink to analogue convertors didn't produce a high enough audio level signal. -- *If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest have to drown too? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Digital Recorder
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... Yes go back and use a computer. It works better has better editing and snap crackle pop removal in editing software. Brian I do transfers from shellac, vinyl, analogue tape 38cm/s and 19cm/s and sometimes even C cassettes!! on a daily basis, I find a stand-alone recorder (the Tascam SS R100) to be the best solution. Then I take the transferred material on USB or SD card to the workstation for post. Iain |
Digital Recorder
RJH said:
On 02/06/2017 20:51, Richard Robinson wrote: Woody said: "RJH" wrote in message ... I'd like to digitise a couple of LPs, and have the facility to do a few more as and when. I'm looking to get a standalone unit as lashing up the computer is inconvenient, plus I like the idea of having the tracks on the device or portable media like an SD card. Any recommendations please? I was thinking of maybe up to £200 new or secondhand. This looks to be OK, but does more than I need: http://www.solidstatesound.co.uk/tascam_sd-20m.htm Have a dig on eBay for a hi-fi type Sony minidisc recorder. Record you disk, then take the recorder to your PC and record it using something like Audacity. Minidisc ? It'd still need digitising, no ? If we're talking 2ndhand from ebay, I'd say a Zoom pocket recorder's a better idea. I've had a Zoom H2 for a few years now, and it works well (it's the nicest pocket recorder I've ever had) - choice of formats, from lowgrade pm3 to better-then-CD wav, plus it records onto SD as the OP said. And should be well within that price range. I had thought of a portable. I would be looking to get as good a recording as possible - so would need to be sure that the A-D conversion was as good as can be. Not a great interface for playing them back, mind, if that's the idea. And if you wanted separate tracks you'd need to either punch the buttons in real time or do the inconvenient lashing-up-the-computer thing to split them out. But I'm not sure there's a way round that. [ being Wrong On Usenet is a very good way of finding things out ]. It'd be a convenient way of getting vinyl onto an SD card if you didn't want to fire up a computer. There might be better devices for playing it back. Playing back would not be the main use, and I'd edit the files on a desktop computer. That was how I digitised my vinyl - play into the zoom h2, then USB the resulting file into the computer to tidy up; because I had one already for other purposes and I reckoned a dedicated sound gadget would probably have a better ADC than a generic computer. But it may not have absolutely the best ADC that's available, I don't really know how to read the specs or rate them. (These 64yo ears are content with the result, that's all I can say) -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem My email address is at http://qualmograph.org.uk/contact.html |
Digital Recorder
UnsteadyKen said:
In article , says... Minidisc ? It'd still need digitising, no ? Only if you're using one of the early analogue MD recorders:-) Ah, okay. I was :-) Then that + lossy compression led me to jump ship in favour of something lossless that spoke USB, so I lost touch & hadn't been aware of their later development. -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem My email address is at http://qualmograph.org.uk/contact.html |
Digital Recorder
Brian Gaff said:
Seems an awful waste of money if you only want to do a few. I still feel that any old xp computer and decent sound caard wiill do the job. I think the quality of the A-to-D conversion is relevant. Plus, in some cases, a different gadget can be more convenient in terms of cabling, depending on where the various bits of gear are in the room(s). -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem My email address is at http://qualmograph.org.uk/contact.html |
Digital Recorder
In article , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes: In article , Richard Robinson wrote: Have a dig on eBay for a hi-fi type Sony minidisc recorder. Record you disk, then take the recorder to your PC and record it using something like Audacity. Minidisc ? It'd still need digitising, no ? MiniDisc is digital. Some have digital out so could transfer to the computer in the digital domain if you have a soundcard which accepts this. But the data compression system MiniDisc uses is rather old and may not be the best. Weren't all the UK Minidisc recorders (and possibly EU ones too) restricted to not having digital out? I looked for one to transfer some live recordings of my band from and couldn't find one. -- Mike Fleming |
Digital Recorder
In article ,
Mike Fleming wrote: In article , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes: In article , Richard Robinson wrote: Have a dig on eBay for a hi-fi type Sony minidisc recorder. Record you disk, then take the recorder to your PC and record it using something like Audacity. Minidisc ? It'd still need digitising, no ? MiniDisc is digital. Some have digital out so could transfer to the computer in the digital domain if you have a soundcard which accepts this. But the data compression system MiniDisc uses is rather old and may not be the best. Weren't all the UK Minidisc recorders (and possibly EU ones too) restricted to not having digital out? I looked for one to transfer some live recordings of my band from and couldn't find one. Dunno them all. I've certainly seen toslink out on them. But MiniDisc was only ever designed as a domestic format - never as a mastering one. Although it did find uses in broadcast, as rather better than things like NAB carts. -- *Procrastinate now Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk