![]() |
Alternative way to analyse LP cartridge behaviour
In recent weeks my interest have gone via a sort of 'almost random walk'.
This started with MQA and the obsession that has with 'timing' via wondering about the time domain behaviour of microphones and old tape recorders to the behaviour of LP replay cartridges and styli. This made me wonder about analysing the stylus mechanical system in terms of a mismatched transmission line. So I've had a go out of curiosity and the initial results, etc, are now available from http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/LP5/StylusBehaviour.html Want to find out a bit more about the materials side. Then maybe look at the associated time-domain behaviour. But I thought some might find the above interesting as is... Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Alternative way to analyse LP cartridge behaviour
Yes, a number of people investigated aspects like vinyl deformation, etc.
The problem was that they tended to get different results and ended up arguing over what was happening! If you have access to the literature look for names like Walton, Barlow, White, Kogan, etc. It seems likely that the vinyl also deformed in a dynamic way meaning the stylus was 'surfing a wave' to some extent. Nonlinear dynamics. There is also an interesting paper by Sank (RCA). Maybe I should reference a list of these on the webpage, but the snag is that for many you may need to be an AES member to access a copy. One possible reason was that the actual vinyl varied. e.g. a current issue of HFN mentions the differences between the vinyl stock used by Decca and EMI and how Nimbus had their own, different, formulation. Jim In article , Brian Gaff wrote: Funnily enough back in the 1970s this topic was ina Shure blurb about their v15 was it cart and what arm etc it should be in and how it affected the transmission line resonances of the cantilever damping etc. I always thought it was a bit of snake oil to blind people with science at the time. Did anyone ever look at the way the surface of the record deformed as part of this? I remember that I had, for a while a Decca London which sounded quite nice but wore records out fast as it had very poor complience. Brian -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk