A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Listening comparison



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 20th 03, 09:02 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Listening comparison


Inspired by the current visit from the Venerable Leader Of The New World
(listen to the backing vocals.... :-) I have posted a couple of clips for
preference testing by simply listening to them:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%201.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3

Anyone got a clear preference here? (Both tracks near identical @1min /1.9
Mb)



  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 20th 03, 11:36 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim H
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 247
Default Listening comparison

more from the 'Keith G school' of uk.rec.audio-ism:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3


After very quick listen I can ABX it out the difference (level matched).
Difference is very easy to hear in the first second, which is a bit of a
cheat given a minuite of music.

Rough impressions are...

1 has stronger treble, less midrange and is generally brighter.
2 possibly more flat response (don't know original so can't really say)
sounds less filtered.

On such a short sample it's hard to say which I prefer - maybe 1 is more
immediate, but I'd listen to a system sounding like 2 for longer. Both are
ok mp3s.

I did level matched ABXing in foobar2000, btw. Very nice little player for
this kind of thing.

--
Jim H jh
@333
.org
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 20th 03, 11:36 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim H
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 247
Default Listening comparison

more from the 'Keith G school' of uk.rec.audio-ism:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3


After very quick listen I can ABX it out the difference (level matched).
Difference is very easy to hear in the first second, which is a bit of a
cheat given a minuite of music.

Rough impressions are...

1 has stronger treble, less midrange and is generally brighter.
2 possibly more flat response (don't know original so can't really say)
sounds less filtered.

On such a short sample it's hard to say which I prefer - maybe 1 is more
immediate, but I'd listen to a system sounding like 2 for longer. Both are
ok mp3s.

I did level matched ABXing in foobar2000, btw. Very nice little player for
this kind of thing.

--
Jim H jh
@333
.org
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 12:16 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Listening comparison


"Jim H" wrote in message
...
more from the 'Keith G school' of uk.rec.audio-ism:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3


After very quick listen I can ABX it out the difference (level matched).
Difference is very easy to hear in the first second, which is a bit of a
cheat given a minuite of music.

Rough impressions are...

1 has stronger treble, less midrange and is generally brighter.
2 possibly more flat response (don't know original so can't really say)
sounds less filtered.

On such a short sample it's hard to say which I prefer - maybe 1 is more
immediate, but I'd listen to a system sounding like 2 for longer. Both are
ok mp3s.

I did level matched ABXing in foobar2000, btw. Very nice little player for
this kind of thing.




Thanks Jim - very interesting response.

I won't comment further in case someone else gives it a go. (There's no big
deal and no 'catch', it's just a 'curiosity' thing.....!!)








  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 12:16 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Listening comparison


"Jim H" wrote in message
...
more from the 'Keith G school' of uk.rec.audio-ism:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3


After very quick listen I can ABX it out the difference (level matched).
Difference is very easy to hear in the first second, which is a bit of a
cheat given a minuite of music.

Rough impressions are...

1 has stronger treble, less midrange and is generally brighter.
2 possibly more flat response (don't know original so can't really say)
sounds less filtered.

On such a short sample it's hard to say which I prefer - maybe 1 is more
immediate, but I'd listen to a system sounding like 2 for longer. Both are
ok mp3s.

I did level matched ABXing in foobar2000, btw. Very nice little player for
this kind of thing.




Thanks Jim - very interesting response.

I won't comment further in case someone else gives it a go. (There's no big
deal and no 'catch', it's just a 'curiosity' thing.....!!)








  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 12:52 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ian Molton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Listening comparison

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:02:08 -0000
"Keith G" wrote:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%201.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3

Anyone got a clear preference here? (Both tracks near identical @1min /1.9
Mb)


the first one sounds 'brighter'. I like the latter better. seems rounder.

no idea which is most natural though.


--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 12:52 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ian Molton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Listening comparison

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:02:08 -0000
"Keith G" wrote:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%201.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3

Anyone got a clear preference here? (Both tracks near identical @1min /1.9
Mb)


the first one sounds 'brighter'. I like the latter better. seems rounder.

no idea which is most natural though.


--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 01:10 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Listening comparison


"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:02:08 -0000
"Keith G" wrote:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%201.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3

Anyone got a clear preference here? (Both tracks near identical @1min

/1.9
Mb)


the first one sounds 'brighter'. I like the latter better. seems rounder.

no idea which is most natural though.



OK, this is getting interesting. Thanks Ian.

Mebbe tomorrow I will post 2 more samples of something completely different
on exactly the same basis, but perhaps a good bit longer. (I can't stand
short little clips myself - they're irritating and tell you nothing!)





  #9 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 01:10 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Listening comparison


"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:02:08 -0000
"Keith G" wrote:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%201.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3

Anyone got a clear preference here? (Both tracks near identical @1min

/1.9
Mb)


the first one sounds 'brighter'. I like the latter better. seems rounder.

no idea which is most natural though.



OK, this is getting interesting. Thanks Ian.

Mebbe tomorrow I will post 2 more samples of something completely different
on exactly the same basis, but perhaps a good bit longer. (I can't stand
short little clips myself - they're irritating and tell you nothing!)





  #10 (permalink)  
Old November 21st 03, 08:54 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
MrBitsy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Listening comparison

Keith G wrote:
Inspired by the current visit from the Venerable Leader Of The New
World (listen to the backing vocals.... :-) I have posted a couple of
clips for preference testing by simply listening to them:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%201.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...harkey%202.mp3

Anyone got a clear preference here? (Both tracks near identical @1min
/1.9 Mb)


Didn't like the first sample at all. Sounded compressed and way too bright.
Second sample, although still bright, was an easier listen and had a nicer
bass response.

--
MrBitsy


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.