I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my
neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed
as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can
make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber
supplement from a "love" shop ;-)

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't
do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can
become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Boys need little love in their lives too!

Just my 2-cents.

Arny Krueger

Arny Krueger wrote:
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my
neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed
as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can
make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber
supplement from a "love" shop ;-)

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't
do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can
become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Boys need little love in their lives too!

Just my 2-cents.


Your a sick man and that was absolutely in the worst taste that I have ever
seen on this group.
--
MrBitsy

"MrBitsy" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my
neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed
as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can
make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber
supplement from a "love" shop ;-)

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends
won't do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives
and can become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Boys need little love in their lives too!

Just my 2-cents.


Your a sick man and that was absolutely in the worst taste that I
have ever seen on this group.

I agree. Whoever forged this post is a sick puppy - someone who is lost in
their pedophile fantasies.

"MrBitsy" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my
neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed
as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can
make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber
supplement from a "love" shop ;-)

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends
won't do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives
and can become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Boys need little love in their lives too!

Just my 2-cents.


Your a sick man and that was absolutely in the worst taste that I
have ever seen on this group.

I agree. Whoever forged this post is a sick puppy - someone who is lost in
their pedophile fantasies.

Hey let's give the guy a break.................................
An arm maybe a knee-cap or 2........just kidding.ba-dum.
Brilliant satire Arny, or are you a card-carring member of NAMBLA? Oh ,
right , you gave your real name.....hmmmmm.
Brilliant satire Arny!

Tom



"MrBitsy" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my
neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed
as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can
make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber
supplement from a "love" shop ;-)

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't
do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can
become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Boys need little love in their lives too!

Just my 2-cents.


Your a sick man and that was absolutely in the worst taste that I have
ever
seen on this group.
--
MrBitsy

Hey let's give the guy a break.................................
An arm maybe a knee-cap or 2........just kidding.ba-dum.
Brilliant satire Arny, or are you a card-carring member of NAMBLA? Oh ,
right , you gave your real name.....hmmmmm.
Brilliant satire Arny!

Tom



"MrBitsy" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my
neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed
as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can
make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber
supplement from a "love" shop ;-)

Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even
private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to
lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park.
Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't
do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can
become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-(

Boys need little love in their lives too!

Just my 2-cents.


Your a sick man and that was absolutely in the worst taste that I have
ever
seen on this group.
--
MrBitsy

It's actually quite sad. The problem isn't one of him being a pedophile,
but his not coming to terms with another problem - that he wishes that
he was a woman. He doesn't seem to be able to come to terms with it,
but if ever there was a case of someone doing everything short of having
an operation - he fits that description.

Now, there's nothing wrong with that - it's his life - and he'd most
certainly be happier as one. People would not have nearly the problem
with his attitude and behavior towards children either - he'd be seen
as more of a sad, lonely person insted.

He'll likely get off on this one too - but my advice would be - go to
a therapist.

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote
He'll likely get off on this one too - but my advice would be - go to
a therapist.

He paid off the last kid didn't he?
Seems like an easy way to make some serious cash.

--
Anthony Gosnell

to reply remove nospam.

"anthony.gosnell" wrote in message


"Joseph Oberlander" wrote

He'll likely get off on this one too - but my advice would be - go to
a therapist.

Right. Let's say for the purpose of argument that Michael was totally
innocent the last time and it was a set up. Even so, a reasonable person
would not want to put themselves through that kind of grief for the sake of
some (for the sake of argument) *innocent* sleepy-time fun with little
friends.

He paid off the last kid didn't he?

Well yes, the parents took what appeared to be hush money.

Seems like an easy way to make some serious cash.

Payment is a *solution* that has since been addressed by the California
Legislature. It will be interesting to see how this situation evolves. We
can count on no small amount of legal talent being hired to try to finesse
the new legal context.

"anthony.gosnell" wrote in message


"Joseph Oberlander" wrote

He'll likely get off on this one too - but my advice would be - go to
a therapist.

Right. Let's say for the purpose of argument that Michael was totally
innocent the last time and it was a set up. Even so, a reasonable person
would not want to put themselves through that kind of grief for the sake of
some (for the sake of argument) *innocent* sleepy-time fun with little
friends.

He paid off the last kid didn't he?

Well yes, the parents took what appeared to be hush money.

Seems like an easy way to make some serious cash.

Payment is a *solution* that has since been addressed by the California
Legislature. It will be interesting to see how this situation evolves. We
can count on no small amount of legal talent being hired to try to finesse
the new legal context.