View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 3rd 04, 09:19 PM posted to uk.media.home-cinema,uk.rec.audio
Chocolate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Domestic & General "repair protection plan"


"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 21:14:08 +0100, Chocolate used
to say...


"loz" wrote in message
...

"Chocolate" wrote in message
...
Just my 2p.
Interestingly that's about all any of your 5 star reviewed cables

are
worth. If you genuinely believe a cable can entirely change the

tonal
quality of a hifi system you've either got too much time on your

hands
or are letting magazines tell you lies.
Not at all, just read what 1000's of people on AudioReview.com are

saying.

Just because 1000's of people are similarly deluded by snake oil

doesn't
mean
they are right.
Remember there are 1,000,000's of other people NOT posting on

audioreview.com.

Yes that's right. In fact, most people are not Atomic Physicists, which
therefore means that atomic physics is just imaginary.


Even Atomic Physicists would know that a very small section of any
particular group would not be representative of what the whole group
thinks.

Of 10 people 2 may speak out and say how wonderful, for example, SVS
subwoofers are, there may be 7 out of the ten who think they are crap.

I'll let you and your physicists work out the rest of it....


What I and my physicists have worked out is as follows:

No-one is talking about the merits of a particular product, as per the SVS
example you are cited.
The discussion is centred on whether or not the quality of a particular type
of product, i.e. cables, has any merit.

The benefits of using any particular component are in no way related to the
percentage of music listeners who own them or would like to own them.