"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message

In article , Arny Krueger
wrote:


Let me guess - he wasn't able to mesure it, but instead provided a
lengthy, hand-wavy theory of questionable merit.

The editor of EW adds a preface to the first article in the series
saying that some readers might not like the author's conclusions.
This seems to me to miss the real point. I'd say that the problem
isn't the conclusions, it is the muddled arguments employed to reach
them. :-)

I think we're pretty much on the same page, here. ;-)