In article ,
MiNE 109 wrote:
I meant that the new element is mixed with the output of the tape
on the way to the next step of production.

Like I said - complete nonsense.

Here's what I meant:

http://recordingeq.com/GlosPubKO.htm#SectO

"2) Sending a previously recorded signal through a console and mixing it
with the audio from a new sound source, recording onto another tape."

Ok then I'll stick to the subject and nitpick. A cutting lab wouldn't have
a suitable console.

Please give a verifiable example of where this has actually
happened. And not from Hollywood, thanks.

No need. My claim was that it could be done.

Sigh. Yet again I have to remind you of what you wrote that started this.

*********

From: MiNe 109
Subject: Valve superiority over solid state - read this (Lynn Olsen)
Date: Fri, Fri Jul 25 00:15:00 2003
Newsgroups: uk.rec.audio

The lp master is also just another step and it can add to the final
work, either by artistic choice (eq, sound treatments, etc) or
literally, using "inserts" or even live overdubs.

********

That doesn't look like a hypothetical claim to me - you're commenting on
the parameters of an lp master.

Then:-

********
From: MiNe 109
Subject: Valve superiority over solid state - read this (Lynn Olsen)
Date: Sat, Sat Jul 26 13:45:00 2003
Newsgroups: uk.rec.audio

You have to really, really want something that isn't on the master or
production master to be on the finished product.

Saw it in a tv movie!

********

Which rather proves you had no idea about reality. I hope you have now.

--
*Honk if you love peace and quiet.

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn