"chris" wrote in message
...
Oohhh "technical competence" again !!
sinewave and meters:- here we go again !! - they have NEVER proved
listenabilty, quality -beyond THD, or very much else!

**Utter nonsense. The battery of tests which are performed on audio
equipment are remarkable predictors of sonic performance. What is clear,
however, is that measurement capabilities presently exceeds the abilities of
most (all?) human ears.

Whilst I will not deny that in some circumstances BOSE have been
superseded.

**ALL cicumstances.


What is incompetent about the bose designs then:- come on Arny, give
us the benefit of your vast technical competence and tell all, and
tell everyone what they should hear and what they shouldn't out of a
set of LS's in real rooms (not anechoic chambers).

**The list of problems with Bose products is quite long. Sticking to the
901, for the moment, there are several major shortcomings:

* ALL rooms are different. There is no point in designing for the "Average"
room, since none exists. It behooves all speaker manufacturers to design for
anechoic environments, since that is the only real reference.
* The Bose 901 uses 9, small drivers, which leads to several problems,
including poor HF dispersion and poor imaging.



And as to whether Peter Sammon works for Bose marketing or not, is
irrelevant, what is, however is that the Co is now run by the Legal
and Marketing Dept's (shame); hence being superseded by other
manufacturers.

**Make no mistake: Bose is run by Amar Bose. Bose Corp is a private company,
not a public one.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au