Keith G wrote:

Jeez, it was just a part of the 'digital bull****' when the MI was trying to
con a generation of idiots over to a new 'perfect sound for life' medium -
if CD was as 'perfectly accurate' as a few here claim, why should it sound
*any* different to the original master??

Not that I wish to support the 'industry line' as such but isnt the
obvious thing here that it *shouldnt* sound different to the master, yet
it is likely to sound quite different to tape / vinyl previously made
from the original master ?