"Ian Molton" wrote in message
...
Keith G wrote:

Jeez, it was just a part of the 'digital bull****' when the MI was trying
to con a generation of idiots over to a new 'perfect sound for life'
medium - if CD was as 'perfectly accurate' as a few here claim, why
should it sound *any* different to the original master??

Not that I wish to support the 'industry line' as such but isnt the
obvious thing here that it *shouldnt* sound different to the master, yet
it is likely to sound quite different to tape / vinyl previously made from
the original master ?


Yes very likely/almost certainly - mostly due to the different replay
methods and equipment used.

One or two here claim 'analogue' adds something, others here (OK, me...) say
'digital' lacks something. Many (mostly not here) can play either one
without a thought - I wish I could.....