View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd 04, 04:02 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default Is Hi-Fi delusional?

In article , Andy Evans
wrote:
From a man who will not / can not even measure the performance of his
own design


Let me repeat for the nth time where n is a large number that I have
nothing against engineering whatsoever, and I go out of my way to have
my amps measured on scopes and distortion meters.


As for "up-to-date" and valve technology


Yes, that's exactly what I said. Check posts on audio Asylum.


I presume that means that ECC83s, 12AT7s, EL43s and the like are not to
be found in your designs?


Correct. I've already given a list of valves that sound better. If you
want references: a) Valve Amplifiers, Ed. 3 Morgan Jones b)
http://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.pl?...hlight=6sn7+th
orsten&r=&session c)
http://www.geocities.com/la1zka/hifi/distortion.html d)
http://www.enteract.com/~joepage/tubelist.htm
http://users.rcn.com/joepage


The copy of Morgan-Jones that I have only gives data for types of valve
that look 'old' to me - ones I recognise from designs back in the pre
1960's. However if I get a chance I'll look at the above references.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html