On 28 Oct 2004 14:10:02 GMT, ohawker (Andy
Evans) wrote:

The reasoning behind this is that it is (I hope you can agree) easily
demonstrable that CD and SS together produce an output which is -
objectively - far closer to what the pianist produced than vinyl and
valves can even hope to be.

I don't think this can be easily agreed - that's the point. Tony Faulkner, the
last time I spoke to him, was using a digital front end but valve amps to play
back master tapes. He supplies masters to the industry. Others claim they hear
nuances on vinyl they don't hear on CD. If by objective you mean measured
distortion, then there will be those (from Hiraga on) who will argue the
relevance of the measurement parameters. If by subjective we mean, for
instance, a pianist who plays a piano all day every day of his life and says
"this here sounds more like my piano" do we dismiss his expertise just because
we chuck it the bin labelled 'subjective'?

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.

Of course you hear nuances on vinyl that you won't hear on CD - or
rather you would hear on CD if you ran it through a compressor the way
it has been for the vinyl version. But what do you say to the artist
and producer who have striven to make their sound as perfect as they
can on CD? We are still here in the land of the subjective "prefer"
masquerading as the objective "better", you see.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com