"Tat Chan" wrote

I don't have a problem with that, as should be the case with everyone
else. After all, you are expressing opinions and preferences, and not
technical details.

Thank you - it ain't hard is it? (Easy to turn it in to a punch-up
though, if that's what you are really wanting....)

nope, not after a prolonged argument here.


OK, that reads like a personal 'you' again - it's a general 'you' (ie not
*you* personally.... ;-)


On the other hand, 'high fidelity' would be a scientific claim ...

Yes, but still so subjective as to be virtually useless.

no, not subjective in terms of electronics (i.e. source and amp). If the
electronics manage to produce an exact copy of the signal on the source
and feed it the to speaker terminals, then that is by definition, 'high
fidelity'. What happens when the amplified signal reaches the speaker
terminals on the other hand, is a different matter. Speaker measurements
are an entirely different thing of which I am do not have much knowledge
on.


Exactly, speakers are the last word in any system after which the room takes
over, which is why I'm not ****ing blood worrying *too much* about the nth
degree of 'fidelity' which is most likely way beyond my hearing/perception
anyway.....

rest snipped - no time