"Mike Gilmour" wrote in message


Surely both the content and the authors background lends credence to
the validity of those posts.

Agreed. On both of these grounds, the posts of SP are far more credible than
those of the now-departed IMC.

have seen Iain's name on
many IMO good recordings and I quickly recalled his name when he
started posting,

Exactly what expertise does a good list of recording credits confer on a
person? What does it mean if those credits are obtained in the context of a
large organization where individual contributions can be hard to nail down?


His further postings and e-mails certainly satisfied me of his
credentials.

This speaks to your credibility Mike. You're way to biased and far too blind
to the well-known faults of legacy audio technologies to be a credible
judge.

IMC was brought in here as some kind of a gold standard of audio expertise.
In fact his, technical feet of clay extended too far towards the tippy top
of his head, to make him very interesting to people who actually know what
they are talking about, such as SP.