In article , Andy Evans
wrote:
All it takes is for somebody independent to change between two sources
in a random fashion.(snip).. the minimum you would do before even
considering reporting to the world.

Hello Don - now, are you seriously suggesting that I buy another
identical transport (which is an obsolete model), set up a switching
device and go out of my way to get a third party to operate it just in
order to make an observation to a recreational newsgroup?

I had thought you were asking for advice and information on the possible
cause of what you beleive you hear, and by implication, how it could best
be dealt with. To do this, you require suitable evidence you can give to
others.


Some parties on this newsgroups seem to think that before stating
anything you should set up a complex DBT which would probably take
several days of one's time and require a variety of equipment and third
parties. Now if I were saying "I have discovered something new, I'm
confident that I'm the first to discover it and I'll be applying for a
patent this week and sending my findings to three scientific journals
once validation is complete" - then, and only then, would I consider
that such demands for DBTs etc had any place on a recreational
newsgroup. Andy

Not really a question of "discovering something new" but of testing if you
have discovered anything at all, and if so, what.

Slainte,

jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html