Nick Gorham wrote:
Ian Molton wrote:


Given that 'better' is a subjective term, or alternately a way of
describing something subjectively, then if someone prefers one over the
other then it is indeed better.



since when was better a subjective term. it requires a context.


Better is a subjective term, think about it, if it requires a context,
then how can it be objective ?

If its meaningless without a context, it must be objective as you must
supply a context.

I contend that without a context, better on its own is meaningless.

Ie. "Brussells sprouts are better".