On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:13:16 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 06:42:56 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton used
to say...

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:16:34 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:59:30 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton used
to say...

They don't, which was my entire point regarding my CV, which mostly
concerns precision electronics *vastly* more demanding than domestic
audio. Know any domestic gear that can detect a submarine's distinct
sonic signature at 2,000 miles?

I would be more impressed with its relevance if it could reproduce a
submarine's distinct sonic signature at 2,000 miles?.

Of course it can, you ****. You amplify and store the incoming sound,
then compare it to the database of known signatures. As ever, you are
indulging in ignorant ranting on a subject about which you know
nothing.

Must have a hell of a good pair of speakers to reproduce exactly eh?

Was it a set of Magneplanars driven by a Krell?

Just a pair of headphones, but the comparison ain't done aurally.
Instruments are *way* better than ears.

Basically you're full of ****. You think because you can do one thing it
automatically gives you the ability to do another.

In so far as I've designed and built more than a dozen high-quality
audio amplifiers, it certainly does give me that ability. You clearly
don't understand much about electronics. I was *designing* audio range
ADCs in the '70s, before the music industry started *using* them.

There we go with the unverifiable claims again.

If you can find a 'Graduate' Marconi ATE, with a Mk 24 Tigerfish
adapter on the front of it, you can verify it easily enough........

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering