"Trevor Wilson" wrote


**That would explain a great deal. I wish I'd known earlier. I have a
policy of not arguing with drunks, drug addicts, children and the aged.


Hmm, I'm 57, 100% teetotal and don't do drugs other than 'normal'
ciggies - so how do I qualify then, eh, Captain Copout??

**I have news for you: "'normal'" ciggies are an highly efficient delivery
system for the most deadly drug in society. If you imagine that the hit
you recieve (within seconds) to your brain helps your thinking, you are in
for a shock. Nicotine shrinks blood vessels, thus restricting oxygenated
blood to the brain.


So? Your point being....???




I think you need to try a little harder, remember what they say:
"Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium!"

(Still don't get it? Oh well - "Such is life!!" ;-)

Don't suppose you know who said that either, do you......???

**I know who said it, here in Australia. In Pommyland, no.


Pommyland? Aw, how twee....! ;-)


OK, so what famous Australian said it then?

(Kinda gives the game away dunnit? - *Famous Australian*!!?? - There was
only the *one*!!! :-)



Ho hum....


(Jeez, ya hafta fekkin' larf.... :-))

**I do. Particularly at one who claims not to be a drug addict, then sucks
down nicotine.


Check the words 'other than' (more of an acknowledgement than you would get
from *most* that cigarettes are a drug...) in my statement above and then
get a grip of yerself.....