Amp swap disappointment
Following recent discussions about distortion and an amp's ability to
reproduce without colouration, I though I'd relay a recent experience.
In an earlier thread I had pointed out that my favourite amp would be
described by many on here as noisy and of inferior design on the basis that
the sound may be coloured or because its performance seems to be sensitive
to it reaching an optimum temperature.
I swapped this amp (an Alchemist Kraken APD6a II) for an Audiolab 8000LX
which had been packed up for a short time. Many on here will be familiar
with this amp, if only by reputation.
The first thing I observed was how much more comfortable I was with the
look, feel, ergonomics and operation of the Audiolab. I can put things on
top of it, for starters (I don't block the air from circulating though the
vents, don't worry), the buttons are all cool to the touch - not *hot* like
the Alchemist, both the input and record selector switches feel the same and
it all operates with a great deal of assurance. It also has a lovely 1/4"
headphone jack on the front panel, which is very useful.
Just one problem. It's boring to listen to. I've been running the Alchemist
in exactly the same setup for a few months and in switching to the Audiolab,
and having listened for about a weeks now, I'm totally uninspired. The sound
is very clean and aesthetically it's all very balanced and even handed,
which is fine on paper, but it doesn't entertain me.
If I were a recording artist, first and foremost I'd want those listening to
my music to be entertained, inspired & moved by it. The Audiolab doesn't do
that for me, the Alchemist does. For all its supposed colour, for all its
foibles, operational quirks - whatever you like - it is by any sensible
measure of what a hifi should be and do, better.
It's a similar difference that I experience when listening to vinyl compared
with CD...
|