In article , Iain M Churches
wrote:

"Nick Gorham" wrote in message
...
Iain M Churches wrote:
[snip]

This is a domain in which I have little experience, but I must say first
impressions were most favourable. I can however, see that SET is
severely limited in its use, and for someone like me, who listens to a
huge range of music, it is probably not suitable. Still, I would not
knock it, just for the sake of doing so:-)

Well, one of the aims of the kind of points I make (e.g. about o/p
impedance) is to see if it may be possible to establish that the 'cause' of
the preference might be due to an identifiable factor which could then be
replicated - if people so choose - with amp designs that do not share the
power limitations or practical difficulties of a SET.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html