Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
Well, I've argued this issue over and over, and have yet to be
convinced in the slightest that Radio 3 should have a 50% higher bit
rate than Radios 1 & 2. Given the following reason, I really do not
have a clue how you can actually argue that Radio 3 should have a
far higher bit rate than Radios 1 or 2:

Clue. Look at the dynamic range of the samples on your website. R1&2 -
about 3 dB. R3 - about 25.


Exactly! It is the narrow dynamic range that makes R1 and R2 more
difficult to encode than R3.

I bet that's confused ya!


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm