But the review was about electronics, and if you're suggesting that every
listener will hear something different, then what's the point of subjective
reviews? That's a question I've often asked myself.

In my opinion, as the technical performance of competing audio equipment is
now so close (arguably indistinguishable), technical reviews will not make
interesting reading, so reviewers have to write personal pieces, based on
nothing other than will it be an interesting read?

Paul's post, albeit wonderfully cynical, I don't think is too far out from
what I've read in Hi-Fi magazines in the last 10 years.

S.

"Cessna172" wrote in message
.205...
"Serge Auckland" wrote in
:

he goes on about how "Stage depth was slightly
foreshortened" Give me a break, it's a resistor! how can it
"foreshorten" anything?

Maybe you need to make the next electronic scientific breakthrough, and
find out why this effect is happening. Either that or stop concentrating
on
the electronics and take another look at the human mind.

--
Cessna172