"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC), "neutron"
wrote:


"Roderick Stewart" wrote in message
. com...
In article , Neutron
wrote:
I don't see this 'challenge' will ever be taken up - factor in a
'financial
risk' and I think you can forget about it....

There are plenty of cable believers who have no financial risk, the
fact
of
the matter is Stewart is a grade 'A' prick, arrogant to the extreme,
smarmy,
with his head wedged fully up his own arsehole. Would you invite
someone
like that into your home?

Is this the best that the "cable believers" can offer by way of well
informed
logically reasoned argument when offered a challenge? is it supposed to
increase the propensity of the scientific community, or indeed anyone,
to
accept their point of view, and if so, how?

trouble is mate, when Stewart acts the way he does, he's going to find it
hard to make friends with anyone who has opposing views. It's the reason
he's doomed to posting on usenet, he's not welcome anywhere else because
he
acts like a cocky prick. I think perhaps he does it purposefully because
he
doesn't actually want anyone to sit the test.

Nope, the cocky pricks are the guys like you who come up with all
kinds of fairy stories about 'night and day' differences among cables,
but run a mile when asked to *prove* that they really can hear any
difference. I used to be polite about this, but six years of
loudmouthed bragging from gutless pricks like you tends to cause a
certain intolerance.

You will forever remain a deluded usenet freak. Goodbye to you.