Don Pearce wrote:

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:27:48 +0200, Forwarder wrote:



I have no reason to believe he is not a man of his word. If you would
like to do this thing independently of his challenge, of course, I am
happy to go along with it.

We *were* supposed to do this anyways, so yes, his "challange" can be
included, if he does not squi..err.. find your protocol inadequate that
is...

I transfer one of my questions above to this thread, might be wise for
you to consider this possibility beforehand:

"The speaker cables I use are just individual, thin strands of
silver/copper wire shielded with teflon coating and braided in a special
construction, no boxes or resistors anywhere. Your lamp cord is lamp
cord. So if my cables somehow produce enough a wider freq resp variation
as compraed to your lamcord (0.1) then does that mean that the test we
have agreed upon on the thread below can't be done? "

I am presuming that you will bring whatever device necessary to measure
the cables, and the lamp cord of your choice of course...


I am not offering any money.

Ok.


And my suggestion of your paying my fare was not to be taken
seriously.

Ok. I will buy you a beer or two though, as in basic hospitality.



I would also like to gather a few more responses to refine my proposed
protocol - I have already seen a few problems with it that I will deal
with and re-post the page.

Ok. When you so confirm, I will send you a personal message for the
contact details when you are in these parts of the woods. Welcome!