Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com
Yo, Pinkerton:
Since October 2004 you sent 4607 message to RAT, which
is rec.audio.tubes. You don't have a tube amp. Your
expressed attitude to tubes is that you hate them. Your
total contribution after 4607 messages to a tube
conference is generally agreed to be zero, in fact
negative. Most consider that you did this vile thing
maliciously and pettily.
If each of those messages took you only ten minutes to
find and read the post you responded to, to type and
send you reply, that is 46070 minutes or 767 hours or
over 50 hours every month to ruin other people's glee
in their hobby
What's your excuse?
No excuse is needed for telling the truth in the face of
hype and false claims.
Only the most monumentally stupid and the most
monumentally arrogant people ever have such certainty in
their own judgement as you and Pinkerton exhibit,
Krueger.
Training in the hard sciences may tend to increase one's propensities in
that direction. Learning that some things definately don't work, and others
definately do has this effect on one's thinking. That which is clear becomes
obvious.
Your determination to control through your
public nastiness the activities of people even in their
harmless hobbies is sociopathic.
Control??? Surely you Jest! I just post opinions like everybody else,
yourself included. People read or not, believe or not, act or not based on
their own thinking.
I have already proved that you, Arnold Krueger, are so
keen to make yourself appear more important than you are
that you will lash out denigration to a group of people
who did you no harm before the group is even specified.
Whatver that means.
This very post above to which you are responding proves
that Stewart Pinkerton is so keen to lash out pain to
others that he spends a quarter of his working life
ruining the pleasure in their hobby of posters to a tube
conference where Pinkerton has absolutely no business,
where it has been repeatedly made clear to him that he
isn't wanted, where his attempt to prove that his way is
better (his dumb KISASS design) ended in a humilating
failure, where his lies are constantly exposed, where no
secret is made of the fact that he is despised for being
scum to a greater extent even than you are.
Next time, you might not hold your feelings back!
The so-called "glee with their hobby" is often pretty
pathetic, as this post fragment from rec.audio.pro
illustrates:
Who appointed you to decide which hobbies people may
follow?
I have no such position, so no appointment is necessary.
"Unfortunately many people have somehow been led to
believe that tubes automatically impart some kind of
magic fairy dust, so manufacturers exploit that."
So what? It's their business and their money.
Right, so when people encounter diverse opinons, they can do their business
and spend their money as those diverse opinions affect their personal
opinions or not.
As we say in the US: "It's a free country". Of course we're not totally free
in the sense of anarchism, but we do have a fair amount of lattitude.
Why is it
so disturbing to you little control freaks that people
hear something different from you?
Disturbed? I'm sitting here smiling while you are obviously, again as we say
in the US: "Dancing on the ceiling".
What has manufacturing hype to do with the DIYers on RAT?
They appear to be customers for manufactured goods such as tubes,
transformers, and other electronic parts.
How does what manufacturers do justify Pinkerton's foul
manners and destructive lunging around other people's
hobbies? Or yours, for that matter, Krueger?
There's no need to justify that which we do not do.
It is truly sick for grown men to justify their existence
(as you, Arnold Krueger, and Stewart Pinkerton,
repeatedly do, as you done again above) by the disruption
they bring to other people's innocent pleasure.
Just the facts, ma'm. ;-)
All this time that is wasted creating bad-sounding amps
could be invested in making good sounding (SS) amps.
Who appointed you UberFuhrer of people's hi-fi?
No appointment is required for a position that I do not fill.
The time could be spent other audio projects that are
forward-looking as opposed to backward-looking.
And approved by you and the equally arid, useless,
uncultured, slimy, ignorant, crude, unmannered, loutish,
uncreative, dull, etc, Pinkerton?
There are no such persons, except in your fevered little mind, Jute or
whatever your name really is.
No doubt after months
of formfilling in quadriplicate and delays, you will
refuse to sanction even a little opamp gainclone if it is
likely to give anyone any pleasure.
Huh?
I did no such thing.
Thanks, but no
thanks. We saw your sort of control freaks in charge in
the Soviet Union already; they ground it to a halt. You
and Pinkerton are harbingers of death, not of light and
life. You two, and your trail of goosestepping
"engineers" and hangerson, are a walking, talking
nightmare to those of us who do hi-fi for pleasure.
What's wrong with doing hifi for pleasure in the context of modern
technology?
We live in a society where whatever is not forbidden by
law is expressly permitted by constitution and usage. And
all the better for it.
Works for me. One of the things that is not forbidden is posting my opinions
on various newsgroups. It's comforting to know that what I do is expressly
permitted by constitution and usage.
You are nor wanted in tube conferences, Krueger,
Pinkerton, and all the other control freak "engineers" on
a crusade. So **** off.
You seem upset Mr. Jute. Are we having a bad day? ;-)
|