Thread: WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old March 4th 06, 02:19 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Robert Morein
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 44
Default WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OFMALICE
In article , "Andre
Jute" wrote:
4607 posts from Pinkerton, 938 posts from Jute over the same period.

Unfair. This doesn't count the 4000+ McCoy/Jute sockpuppets that posted
during this same period. McCoy/Jute is an evil, nasty, nasty man.

And I was presenting a major project over this period, while Pinkerton
was merely hounding the project, me and a whole tube newsgroup, simply
to satisfy his own malice.

"Presenting a Major Project" is McCoy/Jute-speak for dealing with his
chronic constipation.