WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 5 Mar 2006 17:45:32 -0800, " wrote:
But we should note that Jute was presenting the major KISS project,
Mr. McCoy:
As noted and as is becoming more and more clear as even your "Timmies"
and your various and sundry other acolytes appear to be abandoning you:
You write only for yourself. Drop the "we" crap. Lest you think
otherwise, I write only for myself as well...
And your "major " project just does also appear to happen to be a
loose system of fantasies supported by anecdotes of doubtful veracity.
Interesting how fast Jute dropped his claim of 4607 posts from me, and
accepted the true number of 602. Also interesting (and entirely
predictable) that he assumes that it's all about him - these were my
*total* posts to RAT over an 18 month period. An average of one post a
day, and included my own 'major KISASS project', which is every bit as
substantial as Jute's endless turgid prose surrounding a very simple
amplifier.
I won another $500.00 for predicting that he would back off his first
number. I got word of winning the bet while I was giving shooting lessons
to the F.B.I. right after a session of tuning up my car to compete in the
Baja endurance classic. :-)
Shame that he can't apply the same KISS principle to the 'design'
articles, which could have been wrapped up in a couple of hundred
lines, rather than the endless thousands of lines of purple prose,
wild assertions and self-aggrandisement that he's taken to get halfway
through the exercise to date.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|