In article , Stewart Pinkerton
wrote:

Interesting how fast Jute dropped his claim of 4607 posts from me, and
accepted the true number of 602. Also interesting (and entirely
predictable) that he assumes that it's all about him - these were my
*total* posts to RAT over an 18 month period. An average of one post a
day, and included my own 'major KISASS project', which is every bit as
substantial as Jute's endless turgid prose surrounding a very simple
amplifier.

"Turgid" prose aside, whatever that may be, how can you claim your
"project" is anywhere near as "substantial" as Andre's when Andre actually
built his project, while you built nothing?


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/