Audio Banter - View Single Post - WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE

**Stewart Pinkerton** · March 6th 06, 04:43 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:56:16 -0600, (John Byrns) wrote:

In article , Stewart Pinkerton
wrote:

Interesting how fast Jute dropped his claim of 4607 posts from me, and
accepted the true number of 602. Also interesting (and entirely
predictable) that he assumes that it's all about him - these were my
*total* posts to RAT over an 18 month period. An average of one post a
day, and included my own 'major KISASS project', which is every bit as
substantial as Jute's endless turgid prose surrounding a very simple
amplifier.

"Turgid" prose aside, whatever that may be, how can you claim your
"project" is anywhere near as "substantial" as Andre's when Andre actually
built his project, while you built nothing?

Did he? I've yet to see any *proof* of that. Besides, I already stated
why *I* didn't build KISASS, but I'm happy to discuss its design - as
indeed I already have done. What has actually assembling the hardware
to do with the substantiveness of the design exercise?

After all, it's taken Jute several thousand lines to get to the output
of the driver stage so far, without any reference to actual hardware
or test results.

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering