Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 23:30:55 +0200, Fella wrote:


Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:49:55 +0200, Fella wrote:



Stewart Pinkerton wrote:



On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:24:09 +0000, Glenn Richards

Or to put it another way, if I took time off work to do your challenge,
and won, I wouldn't be any better off. Because I'd have lost that £1,000
by taking time off work.


Liar. Chicken**** liar. You think that *anyone* reading this thread is
dumb enough to believe your fairy tales?


Anyone, and I mean ANYONE! reading this thread with an IOTA of
impartiality would agree that you are one psycho with a severe attitude
problem.


Projecting again, Mr Tio?

The man does some tests, whatever, says a thing or two about the
results, and you retort with "Liar. Chicken**** liar." and *I* am the
one with an attitude problem that I'd be "projecting"?!?!?!


No, he did a horribly flawed

... Says you; a postman working in a bank. If you were a competent
"scientist" you would not jump up and down like that, shouting "Liar.
Chicken**** Liar! .. Just another lying chicken****!" etc.. at someone
who is presenting the truth the way he sees it. Point out *what you
think* his mistakes are in a civilized manner.



That's the kind
of combination of stupidity and arrogance

YOUR kind of combination of stupidity and arrogance produces this, mr
postman:

Someone: "I just did a test and am convinced that this is this and that
is that"

Mr Postman: " "Liar. Chicken**** Liar! .. Just another lying chicken****!"

Nuff said.


Why not ask Don and Jim their opinion of Mr Richards?


I don't care about their opinions of Glenn. I would ask their opinion of
your ill-mannered turrette syndrome outbiursts but I know how
"objective" such objectivists can be.



Excellent! Comment withdrawn and apology offered.

It's not me who you should apoligize to. It's Glenn.