On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:14:06 +0200, Fella wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:

On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:02:52 +0200, Fella wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:


On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:48:02 +0200, Fella wrote:



Stewart Pinkerton wrote:



Fact- it is trivially easy to measure a level difference of 0.01dB,
and it is not that difficult to measure a difference of 0.001dB, which
is more than a hundred times less than any human can detect.

I'm going to ask you a question, in a civilized manner. Let's see how
you are going to answer.. If at all.

Here goes; Is the perception and interpretation of music we hear from a
given hifi system *ALL* about DB level changes?


May I answer? You know you that from me it will be polite.

As Mr. Pinkerton's post was in reply to this:

"The human ear is far more sensitive than most test equipment. If you
can measure it, you can certainly hear it."

from Glenn Richards, what the f*ck are you going on about?

OK, I was almost polite, but in the end you were just far too stupid
to deserve it.

Be civil! I am not glenn richards. This is my question, it's s
standalone question, yet again:

Is the perception and interpretation of music we hear from a given hifi
system *ALL* about DB level changes?


If it is a stand alone question, it is even stupider.

Answer the question without going into insults! You are trying my patience!

OK, then. No, it isn't.

Now, why would you even consider that it might be?

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com