View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 06, 02:42 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Jenn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default The extraordinary insensitivity of "audiophiles" on UKRA, RAT and RAO

In article .com,
"Andre Jute" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"Andre Jute" wrote:

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

Absolutely. But that was a reasoned, documented case.

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

A reasoned, documented, proven case, made by me; I didn't just call
Pinkerton malicious, I *proved* that he is malicious.

The case with you is different. You carelessly contributed to a thread
in which I was accused of being a liar. snip


You are not thinking logically. You excuse YOUR action where you
ACTUALLY accuse a poster of bad behavior in the title of a post, but
accuse Shhhhh and me of being "insensitive" because we replied to posts
that had NOTHING to do with you at all. Think it though, my friend, and
stop looking foolish.


I don't know who taught you logic, Jenn, but you should ask for your
tuition back. They either did a very bad job, or you are terrifyingly
stupid, or your memory of what you were taught is faulty.

I deliberately made a case about Stewart Pinkerton and proved it with
documentation. I intended maximum offense to a clown who spent fifteen
months trying to wreck a project of mine for no better reason than his
malice. The documentation proves his malice.

You carelessly signed your name *8 times* to a headline accusing me of
being a liar, apparently without knowing me. If you cannot see how
offensive that is, you and I have nothing in common. Please don't call
me "my friend"; my friends are well-mannered people and you're not.

I think that, in the absence of an instant apology, this conversation
should have been over three exchanges ago. Your behaviour before and
since is inexcusable. Goodbye.

Andre Jute


That's nice hon...sleep well.