paul packer wrote:
On 16 Mar 2006 10:04:04 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:


paul packer wrote:
On 14 Mar 2006 21:16:05 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

As I trundle off to my bath and thence to bed, the score stands at:

Decency 1, Sewer Habitues 19

Well, Andre, I think you deserve sincere congratulations for getting
nyob and Middius to finally agree about something. It may never happen
again, and only a true genius could have arranged it as neatly as you
did. They were hardly even aware it was happening.

I would also like to make a request to all the contributors to this
thread to stop throwing themselves against your ankles. It's getting
embarrassing.

I chuckled at your irony, but I laughed aloud at the mindless pomposity
and stupidity of the clowns that were caught in your trap. You don't do
so badly either, Paulie, at trolling spiky inedibles. God, some of
these people must be a grim drain on the patience of their families.

Andre Jute

Yes, Andre, you've caught me out. I was indeed being entirely ironic,
but I must now back-pedal and give you credit for picking up on what
so many others missed. I expected no better from Arny, who misses most
buses as they pass the stop, but Mr. Peter Wieck is usually sharper
(notwithstanding your opinion to the contrary); something has recently
dulled his edge.

Witless Wiecky has been associating with the Magnequest Scum. They're
feeding him his lines; he's their surrogate and I suppose he fondly
imagines he's on my arse. Dream on, Witless. I didn't know Witless when
he was sharper, if he ever was, which I doubt. I read him for about a
month around about the new year, decided he is dumber than the rear
half of the earthworm after the spade cut it in two, and stopped
bothering with him. I like people who know something I want to know, or
if ignorant, like you (well, okay, you probably just know the same
things I do), are amusing and literate and quick. The world is full of
frowning fools who are a waste of skin and oxygen, like Witless Wiecky;
someone else can read their posts.

On a more serious note, I'm surprised at your current obsession with
punishing those who inmnocently posted to the "Jute is a liar" thread.

Some of those clowns aren't innocent, as you have it. Don Pearce, a
prime flamethrower, let on that he kept going a thread with a headline
calling me a liar in order to do maximum damage. Pearce is notorious
for bashing anyone who points out that his slimy and incompetent pal
Pinkerton is slimy and incompetent. Professional solidarity taken to
that length arouses suspicion about the competence and motivation of
the excessive one, in this case Pearce. But I became bored with the
dull jerks before I got around to giving Don-baby a thread of his own.
He'll be in my face again -- it is in his nature -- and I'll take care
of him then.

But, in general, I started that thread for two reasons:

1. I am seriously ****ed off with the poor manners of people on the
net. Geez, I mean, poor manners deliberately perpeprated as a message
to scum is one thing, poor manners because you appear not to know
better? Ugh. I really wonder what sort of homes more than half the
people on UKRA and RAO came out of. I wasn't joking about trailer park
trash.

2. To demonstrate to Keefie G that when he tries to turn RAT into a
toilet by pointing Stinkerton at us, I repay the impertinence with
interest. In Google, late in the year before last, you will find the
clowns on UKRA creaming themselves at how clever they are in sending us
Pinkerton. A couple of months later you will find me asking them
politely to take Pinkerton back, or else; they thought I was being
amusing. We've arrived at or else. Before I finish, Keefie G will be
screaming to the high heavens in frustration. For now he's given up and
joined the thread...

People often reply to posts without even looking at the thread title;
you can't seriously accuse them of endorsing that thread title just by
posting.

I don't care **** what tenth-raters think of me. I care that they
didn't think about what they said a thread with my name in the
headline. Some of their comments were intrinsically stupid. It's
impertinent to say something stupid in a thread with my name in the
headline. That's a good reason to give them each a good sharp kick in
the goolies. But, as we've seen, most of them are dickless, and some of
them like Jenn are terrifying stupid, self-centered, unaware of their
surroundings, insensitive and obdurate; I doubt Jenn learned anything
from his exchange with me.

Or is that a subtle troll too, and now I've been caught?

What do you think?

Andre Jute
The abyss looks also into you -- Friedrich Nietzsche