Glenn Richards wrote:
Jim Lesurf wrote:

Given that you have said you have an 'IQ' of 130, and seem to have
some technical background, pardon me for asking, but: Do you
understand the scientific method? If so, do you understand the flaws
in the 'test methods' you have described and why they essentially
render what you report worthless as evidence? The problem is that
these flaws mean that we have no way from what you say to determine
if your 'results' mean what you believe or not.


Of course I understand the scientific background. However, numbers and
measurements only tell half the story.

Actually they tell 0.5245 of the story :-)

But, Jim's phrase was "The scientific method", the fact you have not
read that as a well known trio of words and replaced the last one with
background makes me suspect you don't understand or know there is such a
thing.

--
Nick