View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 16th 03, 09:09 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Paul Morgan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default Copy protected CD's not the worst threat to sound quality!

iddqdATworldonline.DenmarK wrote:

Now I'm all for the artists getting a bigger share of the money but I
fear sound quality will get lost in the process of the music
distribution going on-line. My prediction is that getting uncompressed
music will be just as hard as it is to find vinyl theese days!


Agree entirely.... I hate record companies for the fat profits they take out
of CD sales and pass on a pittance to the artist, along with them churning
out drab pop-crap. So anything online music can contibute towards the death
of a few record companies is a good thing IMO.

But on the other hand there's no way I'd pay for lossy compressed music. I
don't mind downloading the odd MP3 to listen to new stuff, I can live with
the drop in SQ when it's free. But when shelling out over £10 for an album I
want the proper uncompressed audio - hence the attraction of audio CD (and
not bloody corrupt copy-protected ones at that!). I'd be quite prepared to
wait the few hours it takes to download an uncompressed audio CD image on
broadband though.

--
Paul Morgan
Replace nospam with paul_morga to reply via e-mail