On Fri, 26 May 2006 15:01:56 +0100, Gareth Halfacree
wrote:

Jim Lesurf wrote:
I've not checked the URL but if they don't make a suitable correction,
then replying a 33 at 45 would also mean the standard RIAA correction would
be inappropriate, thus altering the frequency response. May also encounter
problems with the stylus being able to track the increased modulation
velocities, etc.

In principle, the above could be corrected during the resampling from 33k
up to 44.1k, but as you say, the result would still lose any info above
16kHz.

I have *no* idea what you just said. As I mentioned, I'm a computer
tech - to me, the RIAA is the buggers wot sue the filesharers. That
said, you seem to be agreeing with me so I'm not too bothered.

Now, if you'll excuse me I'm off to my search engine of choice to bone
up on RIAA and the frequency response of vinyl playback. Any
recommended sites where I can grasp the basics? I'm always keen to
learn something new.

Don't use Google, then. If you do, both Ebay and Amazon will assure
you that they can sell you RIAA at the lowest prices.

d

--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com