Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

Fine. Perhaps you'd provide a glossary of what the terms actually
mean.

Why?


Not so. Discussion on anything audio is ok. As is challenging the
wilder claims.

Is tinging said challenges with snide sarcasm an equitable way to go about
that?


Pot, kettle.

Spot the whine...

Keith's stuff is on-topic, interesting, and entertaining.

Not a whine.


What he's
doing is right in line with the spirit of the 'rec' part of the
group's name.

Not a whine.


Regarding your "flowery" remark, Keith is one of the
most skilled users of language in here.

Not a whine.


Maybe you just don't understand why he does it, or why people come to
this (or any other) group.

Not a whine.


Seems to me that you expect this to be a
place where the discourse is dry and factual, where only equipment
of a certain standard is worthy.

Not a whine.

And no tinge of snide sarcasm, either.


--
Wally
www.wally.myby.co.uk