View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old August 12th 06, 11:15 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default A bit of history.


"Eiron" wrote in message
...
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In the late '40s the public would not have heard anything approaching
what
we consider normal these days for sound reproduction - there was only AM
radio restricted by the lines feeding the transmitters to about kHz, and
of course 78 rpm records. And pretty well all reproducers used single
unit
speakers - often large. Amplifiers were invariably SET. So their
perception of what was or wasn't musical was influenced by what they were
used to.


Maybe not what you would call hi-fi, but the public could actually listen
to
jazz bands, orchestras, organ recitals and choral works.




The percentage of the population that could get to 'quality music
performances' on a regular basis was probably even less (if it were
possible) than vinyl users today.....

(No - *really*....!! ;-)


And they did have
access to Tannoy dual-concentrics and Leak or Quad push-pull amps.



So do I.....



Life wasn't all bad for our parents.



I believe WW2 took the shine off it for some of them, for a while......