Iain Churches wrote:

Peter. I think you misjudge this poster. He is a familiar name to
many of us, and the source of many interesting posts.

So I come to find out... but we **STILL** need better information in
order to have a hope at remote diagnosis. I put in my $0.02 in
suggesting that it was an electrical/mechanical problem vs. a P/S
problem, but based on what we have it still could be anything. My
further guess is that most any of us could diagnose this problem in 5
minutes were it on our bench... but it isn't.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA