Eeyore wrote:

[Snipped Text]

I'm sorry to say that you haven't shown much 'professionalism' here
then. You're only contribution has been 'utter drivel', without saying
why you think so.

It's utter drivel because it's not only non-scientific it's actually a form of
'anti-science' ! Do I have to explain what's bad about that too ?

No, please don't.

Professionals have to put up with twits repeating this drivel day in and
day out so I hope you'll excuse me if we get a bit tired of it.

Actually, I do understand you on that one, but I don't normally flame up
so quickly, but then I'm a twit! I think you need a holiday ;-)

--
Andy Hewitt
http://www.thehewitts.eclipse.co.uk/
http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/