Thread
:
The role of 'fake science' in audio
View Single Post
#
124
(
permalink
)
September 19th 06, 10:57 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Eeyore
external usenet poster
Posts: 303
The role of 'fake science' in audio
wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Andy Evans wrote:
If you're in favour of selectively added distortion why not just say so
? Graham
I've put you down for a one hour session with Grabuschka
Yekaterinavich, an excellent brain washer. Ex KGP, immaculate
credentials. She will guide you painlessly through the hour's
brainwashing, and by the end of it you won't even remember that you
ever said this. I will personally pay for the session. Andy
What do you have against added distortion ?
It's a very creative method of 'enhancing' sound.
Why not come out of the closet about it ?
I have no probelm with it if it gets me closer to the sound of live
music.
What if it wasn't a live recording ?
I am a results kind of guy. I have no worries about the path
that leads where I am going.
Provided you can accept you're sacrificing technical accuracy to get that result.
Graham
Eeyore
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Eeyore
Find all threads started by Eeyore