Thread
:
The role of 'fake science' in audio
View Single Post
#
127
(
permalink
)
September 19th 06, 11:06 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Eeyore
external usenet poster
Posts: 303
The role of 'fake science' in audio
wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Keith G wrote:
wrote
So - are you now going to argue in favour of high distortion figures ?
Nope just greater sense of realism. You can argue measurements all by
yourself.
And you can't measure arguments aka opinion.
Actually you can measure subjective imrpessions. It's done all the
time.
Then tell me how you'd measure it.
Hmm, uou seem to have a 'basher' on your hands...??
It looks like you're doing perfectly fine, but it might help you to know
that some of choose to use valves for a greater sense of realism *and*
naturalness. What makes me die is some of these clowns think we would
*actually* choose summat that sounded *worse* (than SS)....???
So how do you explain that the recording travelled intact through an entirely ss
recording and production chain
Please cite an example of an original performance ever surviving intact
through any SS recording and production chain.
See almost any CD or vinyl record.
Graham
Eeyore
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Eeyore
Find all threads started by Eeyore